Campaigns
Advocacy work built and run in South Dakota, mostly bill by bill through the legislative session. Those were launched while the bill was live, often in a matter of days, because a hearing gets scheduled with a week's notice. One is a standing public record rather than a campaign, and it is still being updated.
Everything below is still standing and can be walked through end to end. The campaigns were built while their bill was live, so those pages show the ask exactly as members saw it at the time.
SD Data Center Transparency
Not a campaign with an end date. A standing record of every hyperscale data center project in the state, the hearings and filings behind each one, and how legislators have voted, kept current so people can weigh in while it still matters. 8 facilities tracked, with a legislator scorecard and county-level filings
ViewSD Data Center Action
District-targeted pressure instead of form-letter noise. A district lookup tool put every supporter in front of their own legislators and the right committee, with support and opposition captured in real time. ~2,000 constituent emails across 22 districts
ViewSD Hemp Action
Turned dense statutory language into positions people could actually act on. Supporters understood what the hemp bill did and what to ask for before the hearing, backed by structured outreach that reached the right legislators. ~1,000 constituent emails to legislators
ViewLet Sioux Falls Vote
Kept a municipal referendum's petition drive coordinated in real time. Signers found the nearest signing location and upcoming events on an interactive map instead of guessing where to show up.
ViewPetition Signing Locations
Volunteers offered their markets, stores and tables through a short form, an organizer approved each one, and signers found them on a map embedded in the campaign's own website. Hours and one-off events stayed current without anyone editing a web page. 6 approved locations across 4 towns
ViewProperty Tax Action
Explained a slate of competing property tax bills in plain terms and connected people to their own legislators, so constituents could weigh in on the specific proposal that affected them rather than the issue in general.
ViewOppose SB 239
Built against the data center reinvestment payment program after the bill was hoghoused, when there were days rather than weeks to respond. Supporters chose their own argument: the corporate giveaway, water and electric load, the hoghouse itself, or whether the incentives work at all. Then they reached their own legislators by district.
ViewYour bill is next.
Tell us what your members need to do. We'll tell you what it takes to get them there.
Get in touch